AuthorMessage
Lord_Zero
Ametuar
Posts: 122

Post here information about any records you have broken with hexhub (uptime record, user count, etc).
Lord_Zero
Ametuar
Posts: 122

Biggest flood rate ever seen in opchat of a hexhub:
[2007-01-15 02:02] <•-Emperor's Guard-•> Port: 666, flood rate: 1424.25 connections/sec. (85455.00 connections/min.), number of different IPs filtered: 3564, most frequent country: RO=Romania
InfErnuS
n00b
Posts: 28

Here's a New record for largest connection rate:
[20070226 - 20:25:15] <Emperor's Guard> Port: 666, flood rate: 1843.51 connections/sec. (110610.93 connections/min.), number of different IPs filtered: 74631, most frequent country: CZ=Czech Republic
InfErnuS
n00b
Posts: 28

Highest Recorded Usercount:
   Connections: 25755 accepted, 0 rejected
   Max. users: 8804, current user limit: 15000
Lord_Zero
Ametuar
Posts: 122

Code:
[2007-03-04 00:17] <Lord_Zero> [command] !stats cache
[2007-03-04 00:17] *** Cache information
   Private buffers: 726
   Broadcast buffers:
      1.   MainChat/Quit   8 users
      2.   MainChat/Quit   1 users
      3.   MainChat/Quit   2 users
      4.   MainChat/Quit   2 users
      5.   MainChat/Quit   2255 users
      6.   MainChat/Quit   5793 users
      7.   MainChat/Quit   12 users
      8.   MainChat/Quit   19 users
      9.   MainChat/Quit   8 users
      10.   MainChat/Quit   16 users
      11.   MainChat/Quit   15 users
      12.   MainChat/Quit   8 users
      13.   MainChat/Quit   2 users
      14.   MainChat/Quit   4 users
      15.   MainChat/Quit   2 users
      16.   MainChat/Quit   17 users
      17.   ActiveSearch   8 users
      18.   OldverHello   0 users
      19.   MainChat/Quit   1 users
      20.   MainChat/Quit   3 users
      21.   MainChat/Quit   13 users
      22.   MainChat/Quit   5 users
      23.   MainChat/Quit   1 users
      24.   MainChat/Quit   15 users
      25.   MainChat/Quit   17 users
      26.   MainChat/Quit   2 users
      27.   MainChat/Quit   7 users
      28.   PassiveSearch   21 users
[2007-03-04 00:17] <Lord_Zero> [command] !stats
[2007-03-04 00:17] *** Hub name: Dundee - ']['€AM€LiT€ NetworK, Uptime: 0000-00-00, 01:11:25
   Port: 1411 - 1943 users (1268 active, 675 passive)
   Port: 1977 - 956 users (567 active, 389 passive)
   Port: 411 - 2234 users (1282 active, 952 passive)
   Port: 4111 - 3265 users (1800 active, 1465 passive)
   IOCP: 200 threads (0 busy)
   Connections: 25755 accepted, 0 rejected
   Max. users: 8804, current user limit: 15000
   Command usage:
      $Key: 15969
      $Supports: 15943
      $Version: 15120
      $ValidateNick: 15961
      $MyPass: 19
      $GetNickList: 15115
      $MyINFO: 44375
      $GetINFO: 3593
      $BotINFO: 8
      $ConnectToMe: 154229
      $RevConnectToMe: 70836
      $MultiConnectToMe: 0
      $Search: 81053
      $SR: 88428
      $MultiSearch: 0
      $UserIP: 830670
      $Kick: 0
      $OpForceMove: 0
      $To:: 405
      <Mainchat message>: 394
      <Unknown commands>: 3
      <Unknown data>: 20
   Average transfer rate:
      Sent:   18632427 bps (18632.427 kbps)
      Received:   491339 bps (491.339 kbps)

The hub had searches enabled for active and passive unregistered users and a distribution factor of 8.
As i have seen in all hubs, the most used command is $UserIP (sent by operators who don't have a client that supports UserIP2).
Takel
n00b
Posts: 17

[12:52:52] <!Tåkèl®> [command] !stats cache
[12:52:52] *** Cache information
   Private buffers: 27
   Broadcast buffers: 0
[12:53:34] <!Tåkèl®> [command] !stats
[12:53:34] *** Nome Hub: «ITA..:: ••• ÊÚRØÑ‡K§ ••• ::..» «ÏSS™Network», Uptime: 0000-00-02, 21:17:52
   Porta: 415 - 362 utenti (272 attivo, 89 passivo, 1 proxy)
      Proxy (Socks5): pamfufio
   Porta: 6666 - 231 utenti (145 attivo, 86 passivo)
   Porta: 411 - 1920 utenti (1137 attivo, 783 passivo)
   Porta: 413 - 39 utenti (18 attivo, 21 passivo)
   IOCP: 20 threads (2 busy)
   Collegamenti: 139780 accettata, 2041 rifiutata
   Max. users: 3652, Limite corrente di users: 8000
   Comando usato:
      $Key: 121439
      $Supports: 120619
      $Version: 72840
      $ValidateNick: 121428
      $MyPass: 206
      $GetNickList: 72097
      $MyINFO: 569151
      $GetINFO: 24276
      $BotINFO: 313
      $ConnectToMe: 5260653
      $RevConnectToMe: 4566589
      $MultiConnectToMe: 1448
      $Search: 1798121
      $SR: 397683
      $MultiSearch: 3
      $UserIP: 4451485
      $Kick: 0
      $OpForceMove: 0
      $To:: 1684
      <Mainchat message>: 1475
      <Unknown commands>: 457
      <Unknown data>: 22
   Average transfer rate:
      Sent:   1085618 bps (1085.618 kbps)
      Ricevuto:   42782 bps (42.782 kbps)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
my preceding record
[command]!stats
- [2007-02-26 23:15] *** Nome Hub: «ITA..:: ••• EÚRON‡K§ ••• ::..» «ISS™Network», Uptime: 0000-00-00, 04:06:30
   Porta: 411 - 0 utenti
   Porta: 415 - 3395 utenti (2097 attivo, 1298 passivo)
   Porta: 6666 - 402 utenti (264 attivo, 137 passivo, 1 proxy)
      Proxy (Socks5): zamborospo
   IOCP: 20 threads (3 busy)
   Collegamenti: 21354 accettata, 337 rifiutata
   Max. users: 4120, Limite corrente di users: 8000
   Comando usato:
      $Key: 15424
      $Supports: 15374
      $Version: 13907
      $ValidateNick: 15416
      $MyPass: 30
      $GetNickList: 13880
      $MyINFO: 74865
      $GetINFO: 1673
      $BotINFO: 3
      $ConnectToMe: 530760
      $RevConnectToMe: 350435
      $MultiConnectToMe: 0
      $Search: 177757
      $SR: 728607
      $MultiSearch: 0
      $UserIP: 2450467
      $Kick: 1
      $OpForceMove: 0
      $To:: 492
      <Mainchat message>: 345
      <Unknown commands>: 27
      <Unknown data>: 62
   Average transfer rate:
      Sent:   3293196 bps (3293.196 kbps)
      Ricevuto:   68913 bps (68.913 kbps)
  :evil:
Takel
n00b
Posts: 17

my new record
[21:32:54] <!Tåkèl®> [command] !stats
[21:32:54] *** Nome Hub: «ITA..:: ••• ÊÚRØÑ‡K§ ••• ::..» «ÏSS™Network», Uptime: 0000-00-00, 09:48:33
   Porta: 415 - 1082 utenti (728 attivo, 354 passivo)
   Porta: 6666 - 354 utenti (230 attivo, 124 passivo)
   Porta: 411 - 2466 utenti (1545 attivo, 921 passivo)
   Porta: 413 - 61 utenti (31 attivo, 30 passivo)
   IOCP: 20 threads (3 busy)
   Collegamenti: 40512 accettata, 470 rifiutata
   Max. users: 4002, Limite corrente di users: 12000
   Comando usato:
      $Key: 32587
      $Supports: 32456
      $Version: 22254
      $ValidateNick: 32579
      $MyPass: 50
      $GetNickList: 22126
      $MyINFO: 148886
      $GetINFO: 4424
      $BotINFO: 37
      $ConnectToMe: 989850
      $RevConnectToMe: 741146
      $MultiConnectToMe: 950
      $Search: 349506
      $SR: 106284
      $MultiSearch: 0
      $UserIP: 1708007
      $Kick: 0
      $OpForceMove: 0
      $To:: 291
      <Mainchat message>: 586
      <Unknown commands>: 68
      <Unknown data>: 1
   Average transfer rate:
      Sent:   3328947 bps (3328.947 kbps)
      Ricevuto:   53497 bps (53.497 kbps)
[21:33:47] <!Tåkèl®> [command] !stats cache
[21:33:47] *** Cache information
   Private buffers: 108
   Broadcast buffers: 0
Rulessssss  :evil:
Takel
n00b
Posts: 17

My new record
 !stats
[20:22:01] *** Hub name: «ITA..:: ••• ÊÚRØÑ‡K§ ••• ::..» «ÏSS™Network», Uptime: 0000-00-03, 19:06:55
   Port: 411 - 2949 users (1852 active, 1096 passive, 1 proxy)
      Proxy (Socks5): teekus
   Port: 415 - 1473 users (910 active, 562 passive, 1 proxy)
      Proxy (Socks5): [psv]Orko
   Port: 6666 - 261 users (180 active, 81 passive)
   Port: 413 - 47 users (26 active, 21 passive)
   IOCP: 100 threads (1 busy)
   Connections: 178558 accepted, 32761 rejected
   Max. users: 4755, current user limit: 12000
   Command usage:
      $Key: 153825
      $Supports: 152350
      $Version: 112271
      $ValidateNick: 153814
      $MyPass: 638
      $GetNickList: 111523
      $MyINFO: 885709
      $GetINFO: 79405
      $BotINFO: 383
      $ConnectToMe: 10256689
      $RevConnectToMe: 7265489
      $MultiConnectToMe: 0
      $Search: 2713477
      $SR: 717376
      $MultiSearch: 0
      $UserIP: 7210056
      $Kick: 6
      $OpForceMove: 0
      $To:: 1687
      <Mainchat message>: 1778
      <Unknown commands>: 469
      <Unknown data>: 31
   Average transfer rate:
      Sent:   4485648 bps (4485.648 kbps)
      Received:   84078 bps (84.078 kbps)
[20:27:46] <!Tåkèl®> [command] !stats cache
[20:27:46] *** Cache information
   Private buffers: 125
   Broadcast buffers:
      1.   MainChat/Quit   12 users
      2.   PassiveSearch   3 users
      3.   OldverHello   3 users
      4.   ActiveSearch   0 users
      5.   MainChat/Quit   1 users
      6.   MainChat/Quit   2 users
      7.   MainChat/Quit   3 users
      8.   OldverHello   3 users
      9.   MainChat/Quit   0 users
      10.   MainChat/Quit   5 users
      11.   MainChat/Quit   15 users
      12.   OldverHello   401 users
      13.   MainChat/Quit   2 users
      14.   MainChat/Quit   4175 users
Rulessss  :evil:
Methodman
n00b
Posts: 36

InfErnuS
n00b
Posts: 28

Code:
[20070417 - 21:41:28] <-Axis-> Port: 7371, flood rate: 12168.00 connections/sec. (730080.00 connections/min.), number of different IPs filtered: 3523, most frequent country: CZ=Czech Republic

TO DATE The Largest connection rate recorded in a hexhub 
Takel
n00b
Posts: 17

a new Personal Record
[21:51:37] <!Tåkèl®> [command] !stats
[21:51:38] *** Hub name: «ITA..:: ••• ÊÚRØÑ‡K§ ••• ::..» «ÏSS™Network», Uptime: 0000-00-01, 03:10:00
   Port: 411 - 2073 users (1297 active, 775 passive, 1 proxy)
      Proxy (Socks5): teekus
   Port: 415 - 2707 users (1576 active, 1129 passive, 2 proxy)
      Proxy (Socks5): MarlonFulker, [psv]Orko
   Port: 6666 - 235 users (160 active, 75 passive)
   Port: 413 - 45 users (25 active, 20 passive)
   IOCP: 100 threads (0 busy)
   Connections: 81682 accepted, 9570 rejected
   Max. users: 5522, current user limit: 12000
   Command usage:
      $Key: 62731
      $Supports: 62438
      $Version: 46100
      $ValidateNick: 62728
      $MyPass: 284
      $GetNickList: 45838
      $MyINFO: 316191
      $GetINFO: 11766
      $BotINFO: 102
      $ConnectToMe: 2975328
      $RevConnectToMe: 2025412
      $MultiConnectToMe: 0
      $Search: 907857
      $SR: 205052
      $MultiSearch: 0
      $UserIP: 5026866
      $Kick: 0
      $OpForceMove: 0
      $To:: 576
      <Mainchat message>: 600
      <Unknown commands>: 154
      <Unknown data>: 99
   Average transfer rate:
      Sent:   3896407 bps (3896.407 kbps)
      Received:   71652 bps (71.652 kbps)
Rulessssssssssssss  :evil:
Lord_Zero
Ametuar
Posts: 122

Code:

[21:21] <Lord_Zero> [command] !stats cache
[21:21] *** Cache information
   Private buffers: 873
   Broadcast buffers:
      1.   MainChat/Esci   1 users
      2.   MainChat/Esci   2 users
      3.   MainChat/Esci   0 users
      4.   MainChat/Esci   2 users
      5.   MainChat/Esci   2 users
      6.   MainChat/Esci   18 users
      7.   MainChat/Esci   15 users
      8.   MainChat/Esci   6752 users
      9.   OldverHello   3398 users
      10.   MainChat/Esci   3 users
      11.   MainChat/Esci   39 users
      12.   MainChat/Esci   36 users
      13.   MainChat/Esci   20 users
      14.   MainChat/Esci   20 users
      15.   MainChat/Esci   24 users
      16.   MainChat/Esci   13 users
      17.   MainChat/Esci   16 users
      18.   MainChat/Esci   14 users
      19.   MainChat/Esci   13 users
      20.   MainChat/Esci   16 users
      21.   MainChat/Esci   10 users
      22.   MainChat/Esci   3 users
      23.   OldverHello   5 users
      24.   MainChat/Esci   25 users
      25.   Ricerca passivo   19 users
      26.   MainChat/Esci   4 users
      27.   MainChat/Esci   12 users
      28.   MainChat/Esci   26 users
      29.   MainChat/Esci   13 users
      30.   MainChat/Esci   5 users
      31.   MainChat/Esci   19 users
      32.   MainChat/Esci   30 users
      33.   MainChat/Esci   26 users
      34.   MainChat/Esci   16 users
      35.   MainChat/Esci   14 users
      36.   MainChat/Esci   2 users
      37.   MainChat/Esci   8 users
      38.   MainChat/Esci   17 users
      39.   OldverHello   4 users
      40.   MainChat/Esci   1 users
      41.   Ricerca attivo   5 users
      42.   MainChat/Esci   0 users
      43.   MainChat/Esci   29 users
      44.   MainChat/Esci   6 users
[21:21] <Lord_Zero> [command] !stats
[21:21] *** Nome Hub: «ITA..:: ••• ÊÚRØÑ‡K§ ••• ::..» «ÏSS™Network», Uptime: 0000-00-01, 19:56:28
   Porta: 411 - 8853 utenti (5584 attivo, 3267 passivo, 2 proxy)
      Proxy (Socks5): pamfufio, teekus
       (3 SYN/sec.)
   Porta: 415 - 1746 utenti (984 attivo, 759 passivo, 3 proxy)
      Proxy (Socks5): [psv]Orko, aleksad, [AWE]genstuff
   Porta: 6666 - 235 utenti (160 attivo, 75 passivo)
   Porta: 443 - 1 utenti (1 attivo)
      Attiva: [ro][ph][a-computers]
   *Port: 413 - 48 utenti (24 attivo, 24 passivo)
   IOCP: 100 threads (0 busy)
   Collegamenti: 158639 accettata, 40100 rifiutata
   Max. users: 10866, Limite corrente di users: 15000
   Comando usato:
      $Key: 144190
      $Supports: 143659
      $Version: 93777
      $ValidateNick: 144157
      $MyPass: 462
      $GetNickList: 93400
      $MyINFO: 610733
      $GetINFO: 19449
      $BotINFO: 202
      $ConnectToMe: 13126188
      $RevConnectToMe: 5129763
      $MultiConnectToMe: 0
      $Search: 1763798
      $SR: 452711
      $MultiSearch: 0
      $UserIP: 10142411
      $Kick: 0
      $OpForceMove: 0
      $To:: 3879
      <Mainchat message>: 2499
      <Unknown commands>: 254
      <Unknown data>: 123
   Average transfer rate:
      Sent:   26297891 bps (26297.891 kbps)
      Ricevuto:   299842 bps (299.842 kbps)

Settings that are different from default ones:
Distribution factor: 16
Send cycle: 2
Send timeout: 20
Level timeout: 4
Max. SYN / hub port: 100 / second
Max. connections from all: 100 / second
Max. logins: disabled
Takel
n00b
Posts: 17

my new record hahahahahaha
!stats
[15:08:29] *** Hub name: «ITA..:: ••• ÊÚRØÑ‡K§ ••• ::..» «ÏSS™Network», Uptime: 0000-00-02, 14:56:08
   Port: 411 - 12857 users (7999 active, 4855 passive, 3 proxy)
      Proxy (Socks5): pamfufio, [RO]aleksadsa, teekus
       (5 SYN/sec.)
   Port: 415 - 866 users (463 active, 402 passive, 1 proxy)
      Proxy (Socks5): [psv]Orko
   Port: 6666 - 218 users (143 active, 75 passive)
   Port: 443 - 29 users (18 active, 11 passive)
   *Port: 413 - 7 users (2 active, 5 passive)
      Active: [RO][MS][RDS]Atybiker, Gianni-flash
      Passive: £µÑ姆Rê§§, Lorenzo, [ES][M][maniackchamp], bobu, ille
   IOCP: 100 threads (0 busy)
   Connections: 335841 accepted, 91841 rejected
   Max. users: 13959, current user limit: 15000
   Command usage:
      $Key: 311723
      $Supports: 310805
      $Version: 196627
      $ValidateNick: 311625
      $MyPass: 714
      $GetNickList: 195977
      $MyINFO: 1180305
      $GetINFO: 19625
      $BotINFO: 289
      $ConnectToMe: 42117820
      $RevConnectToMe: 14495018
      $MultiConnectToMe: 0
      $Search: 3725326
      $SR: 799302
      $MultiSearch: 1
      $UserIP: 22351721
      $Kick: 0
      $OpForceMove: 7
      $To:: 6814
      <Mainchat message>: 4546
      <Unknown commands>: 416
      <Unknown data>: 203
   Average transfer rate:
      Sent:   30543240 bps (30543.240 kbps)
      Received:   309316 bps (309.316 kbps)
Hex RULEEEEEEZZZZZZZ  :evil:  :evil:
InfErnuS
n00b
Posts: 28

This is the result of when my pinger pinged euroniks:
Code:
[20070422 - 13:48:50] <-RegServer->
Search Request Returns: «ITA..:: ••• ÊÚRØÑ‡K§ ••• ::..» «ÏSS™Network»
Address: euroniks.no-ip.biz:415
Hub Software: HeX_HUB_v4.01
Users: 13884
Share Size: 809877103944147
Location: Germany
Consecutive Times Offline: 0
Times Pinged: 62
Times Online: 60
Reliability: 96.7741935483871 Percent
Connectivity: 410 Milliseconds
Login Time Total: 10.71 Seconds
Total Ping Time: 10.71 Seconds

Takel
n00b
Posts: 17

RULEZZZZZZZZZZ  :evil:  :evil:
ahile
n00b
Posts: 18

[command] !stats
[19:35:52] *** Nume hub: •• Aron Instal Hub ••  --  www.Aron-Instal.Ro, Online: 0000-00-04, 02:57:29
my bigs uptime on hexhub  ( 4 the moment )  04 days , 02:57:29 h / m / s
Lord_Zero
Ametuar
Posts: 122

I wouldn't call that a record. You should post here after you have at least 3 months of runtime with last version. The record i know so far is Moshu having a 3.x version running for 2 months (i hardly convinced him to update to last version).
Takel
n00b
Posts: 17

today i've a new record of number of filtered connection
loooooooooooooooool
HEX RULESSSSSSSSSSSSSS
 [23:52:15] <•HèXHµß•> DDoS stopped. Found 358 different IPs and filtered 166957346 invalid connections.
 
this is because i've disable hex firewall.. (wrong)
well i regard a ddos man......   :x
Hex Rulezzz
 :evil:  :evil:  :evil:  :evil:
Takel
n00b
Posts: 17

Hello ppl...
my up record    with 4000/6000 users
[00:23:00] <!Tåkèl®> [command] !stats
[00:23:00] *** Hub name: «ITA..:: ••• ÊÚRØÑ‡K§ ••• ::..» «ÏSS™Network», Uptime: 0000-00-16, 02:47:07
   Port: 411 - 4115 users (2472 active, 1642 passive, 1 proxy)
      Proxy (Socks5): cabrillo_1
   Port: 415 - 260 users (155 active, 105 passive)
   Port: 413 - 18 users (6 active, 12 passive)
      Active: ![SERVER-VIP]tenia078, cipeciop, xavier, ![server-reg]fabry, teO_, Jealcoot
   IOCP: 100 threads (700 busy)
   Connections: 1304792 accepted, 26234 rejected
   Max. users: 8373, current user limit: 15000
   Command usage:
      $Key: 1193577
      $Supports: 1188475
      $Version: 1068250
      $ValidateNick: 1193133
      $MyPass: 3310
      $GetNickList: 1065951
      $MyINFO: 6775828
      $GetINFO: 14998262
      $BotINFO: 1422
      $ConnectToMe: 605295247
      $RevConnectToMe: 66840716
      $MultiConnectToMe: 933
      $Search: 20337096
      $SR: 88216138
      $MultiSearch: 28
      $UserIP: 94507110
      $Kick: 9
      $OpForceMove: 0
      $To:: 23737
      <Mainchat message>: 11652
      <Unknown commands>: 3682
      <Unknown data>: 236
   Average transfer rate:
      Sent:   2904348 bps (2904.348 kbps)
      Received:   105433 bps (105.433 kbps)
[00:23:13] <!Tåkèl®> [command] !stats cache
[00:23:13] *** Cache information
   Private buffers: 203 (~14455 bytes / block)
   Broadcast buffers:
      1.   MainChat/Quit   7 users (931 bytes)
      2.   MainChat/Quit   2 users (486 bytes)
      3.   PassiveSearch   1111 users (47 bytes)
      4.   ActiveSearch   2042 users (44 bytes)
RULEZZZZZZZZZZZ :evil:  :evil:
BlackSonar
n00b
Posts: 42

Very nice results
But:
iptables performance with 1518 Byte frame size and <=50 rules: 95.000-96.000  DROP/sec
iptables performance with 512 Byte frame size and <=50 rules: 94.000-95.000  DROP/sec
iptables performance with 128 Byte frame size and <=50 rules: 83.000-84.000  DROP/sec
Tested with very old 2.4.x kernel series and iptables 1.2.x
Lord_Zero
Ametuar
Posts: 122

Rejected connections do not necessarry mean that an attack is in progress. The hub also rejects connections of users banned in firewall (_ban0_).
Filtered rate deppends on attackers. The hub cannot filter more than it gets.
Btw... iptables... are you joking ? Iptables is written in C++ - this means it uses many asm instructions to traverse a filter with 50 rules. HeXHub's firewall uses only one instruction - repnz scasd to traverse the entire filter (in case of a DDoS attack i have seen more than 1000000 rules in some hubs). Nothing is faster than that.
Meka][Meka
Unstopable
Posts: 700

and what does linux and iptables gotta do with hexhub?? :?
Takel
n00b
Posts: 17

mystery
BlackSonar
n00b
Posts: 42

REJECT and the DROP not identical concepts, the test was made with 2 direct PCs in a contact, from this apparently the 100Mbit logically inferable. The ban and rejecting the packet then only can save the uploading bandwidth from the unnecessary traffic. It is not possible to save the download bandwidth then efficiently if the firewall rejects the contact.
As we discussed previously, each time an IRQ is generated some CPU time is taken. If enough IRQ's can be generated, the CPU will have no time to do anything other than serve the interrupts. Inbound packets do not get processed, applications get no CPU time, and your system is effectively dead in the water. This is known as "Live-lock". Your system is still live, in so much that it has not crashed, but it is locked from performing any useful functions.
From it that HeXHub assembly on a language been written, does not come next that faster.
It was leaning dogma, that assembly or C faster than the C++. Assembly may be slow on a language not optimized, C++ may be an express on a language, to write an optimized application.
A little No. filter rule, which you saw, may be very efficient or experienced in no way objective opinion.
If we are at the performance already LamaHub with 5000 users 2% average CPU produces a load. Yourself may look at it ZeXx86 on his forum.
Meka][Meka
Unstopable
Posts: 700

ive no idea what you jus said, but do u actually know how to program at all, if not, then u cant say anything at all as u dont know what u are talking about... at least i cant understand what u r talking about,
Lord_Zero
Ametuar
Posts: 122

Quoted from BlackSonar
It is not possible to save the download bandwidth then efficiently if the firewall rejects the contact.

Did anybody say it's possible ? As i see you didn't even test the firewall you talk about. HeXHub doesn't send TCP/RST, "rejected" in this case is same as "dropped".
Quoted from BlackSonar
As we discussed previously, each time an IRQ is generated some CPU time is taken. If enough IRQ's can be generated, the CPU will have no time to do anything other than serve the interrupts.

Did you ever succeed with generating those many IRQ's ? Feel free to test that on my system.
Quoted from BlackSonar
Assembly may be slow on a language not optimized, C++ may be an express on a language, to write an optimized application.

Didn't i just say that HeXHub's firewall uses only one asm instruction to traverse the entire filter ? No other language can do that with only one asm instruction. What can be more optimized than that ?
Quoted from BlackSonar
If we are at the performance already LamaHub with 5000 users 2% average CPU produces a load. Yourself may look at it ZeXx86 on his forum.

Maybe you should also visit his forum and paste there all the requests you told me (like remote registry detection / port scanning users / etc). Probably he'll implement all those even knowing that you are the only person who requested them and not even you will use them.
Before asking for new features for a hubsoft would be better to actually use that hubsoft (you requested many times for features that HeXHub already has).
BlackSonar
n00b
Posts: 42

Dear Meka][Meka:
It is not necessary to be a programmer, it is necessary to know Linux, and you know it immediately what I talk about.
Lord_Zero response you are a Linux BSD would be enough ridiculous one on a forum.
BlackSonar
n00b
Posts: 42

Dear Lord_Zero
HeXHub: The person who has to be afraid of something builds up a fortification only.
The past: Well-known how you are not angels.
"Feel free to test that on my system." - You are good at a dog rather
Lord_Zero
Ametuar
Posts: 122

Quoted from BlackSonar
Dear Lord_Zero
HeXHub: The person who has to be afraid of something builds up a fortification only.
The past: Well-known how you are not angels.

Protection is only a small part of HeXHub. You should try to use it before saying anything about it.
Of course we're not angels, we're devils and satans. 
BlackSonar
n00b
Posts: 42

Dear Lord_Zero
Not I gave a thought to you personally although everybody owes his own conscience settlement.
I believe it in a dog we agree.
Lord_Zero
Ametuar
Posts: 122

Quoted from BlackSonar
I believe it in a dog we agree.

You're the only dog on this forum.
BlackSonar
n00b
Posts: 42

Dear Lord_Zero
You translated one on my message. I do not claim it HexHub bad you are software not optimized.
I claimed it that it iptables your formed opinion not objective.
You wrote:
"Did anybody say it's possible ? As i see you didn't even test the firewall you talk about. HeXHub doesn't send TCP/RST, "rejected" in this case is same as "dropped". "
But:
The drop because of this incomplete protection, because what the firewall throws away is the packet, he arrived already.
Dared throw it away only may be. That is the packet used a bandwidth. - Back because of this
How does a received packet not take away a bandwidth? A starting system administrator knows this yet. It that the firewall throws it away you are irrelevant incompletely.
Ashura
Unstopable
Posts: 370

uhm i dont understand these parts with the dog  :roll:  wtf is "at a dog" and "in a dog", some sorta game or what 
anyway u'll use less bandw to drop the packets from rejected connections than to accept them
Lord_Zero
Ametuar
Posts: 122

Quoted from BlackSonar
How does a received packet not take away a bandwidth? A starting system administrator knows this yet. It that the firewall throws it away you are irrelevant incompletely.

Who said that received packets don't take banwidth ?
All firewalls can filter packets, that's one of the reasons people use them. You are probably the only system administrator who does not know that.
Speaking of "irrelevant"... there's too much offtopic already.
BlackSonar
n00b
Posts: 42

I see it the last one 2 sentences circulating out entailed a success.
But your question:
"Did anybody say it's possible ?
And the answer sended:
"The drop because of this incomplete protection, because what the firewall throws away is the packet, he arrived already.
Dared throw it away only may be."
People: The firewall is not able to protect the download bandwidth perfectly. And this essence. You throw away the packets vainly, takes away some download bandwidth then.
Meka][Meka
Unstopable
Posts: 700

i think i understand what he is trying to say
'i used the dumbass to english translator'
something like 'a waste of a packet to disregard it, when there is many packets', well if so, thats wrong, it is better to disregard packets if the firewall already knows where they are coming from and what they are, otherwise it would just waste precious CPU time, now what was that about dogs... ?
Ashura
Unstopable
Posts: 370

what u suggest to be done with those packets then? send em with the post?
BlackSonar
n00b
Posts: 42

Dear Lord_Zero
first apology
Calmness, there is peace, you are nervous only according to me. Is not needed everything you are for a criticism for an attack to have bought. I acknowledge your programming work, HeXHub greatness. It somebody else question that on the salve of your other activities objectionable.
You wrote:
"You are probably the only system administrator who does not know that." - Did you not take this statement of yours seriously?
BlackSonar
n00b
Posts: 42

You wrote:
As i see you didn't even test the firewall you talk about.
My answer:
Already from the very beginning not HeXHub the topic, you present it as it at the worst.
Yes, true, a time of his disused, but I not too HexHub spoken.
Principle that the drop does not send back TCP/RST packet, REJECT is a yes.
Do not lecture others about it what is known anyway already.
HeXHub is not the world's middle only in exchange of you though.